Skip to content

ENGAGEMENT MODELS

Engagement Models & Typical Ranges

Pay for reduced execution risk—not more meetings. We translate ambiguity into decisions that hold, so teams ship without costly reversals.

Trusted by teams behind:

Silicon Valley Central Chamber of Commerce

What we optimize for

Fewer surprises & reversals

Risk surfaced early—before it becomes rework.

Decisions that stick

Clear owner + evidence required.

Execution that converges

A shippable product—not endless debate.

 You leave each step with written outputs your team can execute—no dependency required.

Engagement ladder

(Most teams start here)

Product Clarity™ Briefing

30 minutes • Complimentary

  • Best for: “We need help this week.”
  • You get: written takeaways + the smallest next step that reduces risk fastest
BOOK A PRODUCT CLARITY BRIEFING

48-Hour Focus & Risk Snapshot

48 hours • Fixed fee (scoped)

  • Best for: “We need clarity before we commit more time or capital.”
  • You get: top risks ranked by impact + next 2–3 decisions (with owners)
  • Short plan for the next 1–2 weeks

Product Clarity™ Diagnostic

1–2 weeks • $5,000–$15,000

  • Best for: post-funding drift, roadmap churn, missed milestones, investor skepticism
  • You get: a structured written assessment + decision-ready options + sequencing
  • Shareable with leadership/investors

 Programs & Add-Ons

(When the stakes demand follow-through)

90-Day Product Clarity™ Sprint

  • 90 days • program pricing (fixed plan, defined outcomes)
  • Stabilize MVP boundary, stop churn, restore milestone credibility
PRODUCT CLARITY SPRINT

Technical Due Diligence

  • Timeline-based • depth + timeline pricing
  • Feasibility + execution integrity beyond the deck
TECHNICAL DUE DILIGENCE

Fractional Product Leadership

  • Monthly retainer • cadence + responsibility
  • Stabilize roadmap, decisions, delivery confidence
FRACTIONAL PRODUCT LEADERSHIP

What drives pricing

  • Urgency (this week vs this month)
  • Stakeholders (number of decision-makers)
  • Complexity (hardware/software, regulatory, dependencies)
  • Depth (quick signal vs board/IC-ready rigor)
  • Ambiguity (MVP boundary + done criteria)

Fit check

This is a fit if,,,

  • You have real stakes (capital, deadlines, credibility)
  • The team is working—but the product isn’t converging
  • You want decisions explicit, owned, evidence-based

Not a fit if…

  • You want more hands without fixing decision clarity
  • You’re shopping for the lowest-cost generalist help
  • You won’t define what you will not build

Want to take the smallest next step that reduces risk fastest?

Complimentary • 30 minutes • written takeaways • this-week availability